x VAX_DANGER
(2022-07-26) SPECIAL:
Australian gynecologist Dr. Luke McLinden fired before releasing data showing
miscarriage rate of (50% - 74%) in women post-vaccination. [killJAB] Developing
Story: Australian gynecologist Dr. Luke McLinden has been
keeping stats since the introduction of the vaccine, found that (50% - 74%)
of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages
Super Spreader Jul 26 UPDATE: (2022-07-27 @19:00 EST) I reached out to Dr. McLinden
and received a response from a colleague. I have forwarded your email. It’s
important the data gets published, at least as preprint or will be discredited
before it sees the light of day.
The miscarriage rate was 50% for all comers, the 74% concerned close vaccination
around time of conception I asked if it was ok to post the response and was
told it’s ok, with a bit more: You can say that amongst high risk pregnancy
after vaccines started 19 of 38 had a miscarriage (50%) vs around 14% pre vaccine
(40 people from memory).
There appears to be a relationship with the proximity of vaccination to conception
that may elevate the risk further to around 74% but this data is preliminary
and is in process of being published. So, this is certainly bad, 50% compared
to 14%, but, good news, not as bad as 74% for EVERY jabbed pregnancy.
PDF
Study "The COVID-19 vaccines did
not save lives and appear to be lethal toxic agents - the vaccines did not reduce
serious illness (as claimed by manufacturers) enough to reduce any risk of death.
In the 17 countries of the present study, there is no evidence" >>>
SEE
STUDY from September 2023 PDF
Study COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the
Southern Hemisphere Denis G. Rancourt,1, * PhD ; Marine Baudin,2 PhD ; Joseph
Hickey,1 PhD ; JÊrÊmie Mercier,2 PhD 1 Correlation Research in the Public Interest
(correlation-canada.org) 2 SantÊ LibertÊ Oø (jeremie-mercier.com)
Imagine a vaccine so safe you have to be threatened to take it , for a disease
so deadly you have to be tested to know you have it.
The current Covid19 vaccines have several problems. I would say that there are
9 main areas of interest: the spike protein appears to be cytotoxic.
the
emergence of immune escape variants.
the
potential for antibody dependent enhancement.
the
potential for autoimmune disorders.
the
narrow design focus of the vaccines.
the
fact that alternative treatments are available to both prevent and treat covid.
they
are trying to jab everyone, even people who have recovered from covid and do
not need the jab.
there
are a growing number of severe reactions to the vaccines but this fact gets
very little coverage in the press and sometimes it even gets outright censorship.
the
potential for long term unknown side effects and the potential impact of this
on national security.
Below
is a brief overview of each issue with scientific data below for support
(except for 9. which is more a discussion based on a logical assessment
of future risk).
1. The spike protein of the virus, that is also being utilized in the vaccines,
is damaging to our cells through 3 mechanisms. The first is that when the
spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the ACE2 to send signals
to the mitochondria within the cell which destroys the mitochondria, eventually
killing the cell. The second is that when the spike protein binds to our
ACE2 receptors it causes the ACE2 to send signals to other cells which increases
the amount of pro-inflammatory agents in the blood. This inflammation damages
the tissues. The third way is that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2
of the platelets in our blood, it causes them to clot. Now, the vaccine
manufacturers did take steps to make the spike protein more safe. The spike
protein has two parts an S1 subunit and an S2 subunit. The S1 is the part
that connects to the ACE2, and the S2 is the part that opens up like a knife
stabbing the membrane and facilitates fusion between the membrane of the
cell and the envelope of the virus. With the vaccines, they modified the
S2 subnit so that it could not open up and jab into the cell membranes if
it connects with any ACE2 receptors. They thought this would make the spike
protein safe, but this assumption is false and if they had taken the time
to do more research before rushing to production they would have found that
out. It may seem like the jabby bit is what damages the cells, but actually
the major damage is caused by the S1 connecting to the ACE2 receptor. Just
the S1, by itself without the S2, causes the ACE2 receptor to start the
cell signaling processes that cause the mitochondrial damage, the pro-inflammatory
response, and the blood clots.
Biodistribution data:- Pfizer animal testing document
that was obtained by Dr. Byram Bridle through a FOI request to the Japanese
government which shows the biodistribution of the lipid-nano particles throughout
the bodies and organs of the test subjects. This is evidence that the lipid
nanoparticles do not stay in the injecton site, but instead travel all throughout
the body (go to pg 16/23 for the charts showing biodistribution over the
course of 48hrs): https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf
Addendum to the above link. This blog post provides easy to understand information
(with pictures) on the make-up of the lipid nanoparticles used in the Covid19
vaccines. It shows that the pharmaceutical companies could have designed
them to have targeting ligands on the outside, so that the nanoparticles
would only transfect the muscle cells. But instead the vax was designed
with PEG polymers on the outside, so that the immune system will not be
able to pick them up and put them in the trash. The PEG is what Byram Bridle
says is the reason the vaccine travels throughout the body and since it
does not have targeting ligands, it can transfect any type of cell: https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines
2. Vaccine enhanced immune escape occurs when a poorly designed or weak
vaccine helps create new variants. This happens in the exact same way as
antibiotic resistance and regular old evolution. In the case of evolution,
if you want to make an organism stronger, you put it under evolutionarily
unfavorable conditions. This way you kill all the weak examples of the organism
and just leave the strong ones. If you want to create heat resistant bacteria,
put a petri dish full of the bacteria under moderately high heat that kills
99% of the bacteria. Save the 1% that were able to survive the heat, allow
them to grow, and repeat the process over and over again while turning up
the heat just a little each time. Do this until you have a population of
bacteria that are all extremely heat resistant. The same process occurs
with antibiotic resistance. When you only take half your meds, you kill
99% of the bacteria and you leave only the 1% that were slightly more resistant
to the drugs and now they flourish. Before they were a small part of the
population but you changed the conditions of their environment so that they
have the advantage. You've killed all the normal bacteria that the mutant
variants had to compete with so that now the antibiotic resistant bacteria
are the alpha strain that have unlimited resources and so surge in population
to take over your body. Well, the same thing happens with viruses and vaccines.
If you produce a vaccine that elicits a weak immune response, you are creating
an unfavorable environment for the virus. This will kill the weak 99%, and
leave those 1% of mutant virus particles that are not as hindered by the
antibodies produced by the vaccine. Whereas before these mutants were only
a tiny part of the population and would have been unlikely to transmit on
to the next person. Now these mutant virus particles surge in number because
they no longer have to compete with the other virus particles and your bodies
defenses do not work. They are now highly likely to transmit on to the next
person, whereas before they would not have been able to leave the host in
which the mutation occured. In terms of creating variants, the current covid
vaccines are very bad for three reasons. First, some vaccine manufacturers
require two shots and now also boosters because the first shot produces
a very weak immune response. Second, the vaccines are very leaky. Even after
you have gotten a full immune response from both shots, you can still get
and transmit the virus onto others. Well, which virus particles are likely
to get passed on by a fully vaccinated person? Clearly they will be those
virus particles that have the ability to multiply quickly while avoiding
the antibodies produced by the vaccines. This will create very virulent
and antibody resistant variants. Watch for these variants in the news as
time goes on, we're already seeing things like Delta, Lambda, Eplsion, etc.
As we implement boosters, they will start to come at faster and faster rates,
and over time data scientists will start to see timed correlations between
the implementation of mass boosters and the emergence of new strains. Third,
the vaccines do seem to help reduce the severity of the disease when people
are infected (although this may change as new variants emerge). Why would
this be a concern? Well, because of the leakiness of the vaccines we just
spoke about. If you have very low symptoms but you can still get and transmit
the virus, then you won't even realize that you're sick and you'll be spreading
the virus to even more people as an asymptomatic carrier. So, these vaccines
will only increase transmission by creating more and more asymptomatic carriers
(although this may not be a bad thing, if everyone in the world gets the
virus and everyone is asymptomatic, then there's really no need to care
about covid anymore. But this is an unrealistic idealization that is unlikely
to occur, some people will still get sick and die or suffer long haul covid).
One additional point to address here is the claim that the unvaccinated
are causing the emergence of new vaccine resistant variants. Let me be clear,
the unvaccinated absolutely have the ability to facilitate the creation
of new variants. However, it would require a statistically enormous number
of people to get the virus before they could produce a new variant by chance.
This is because a mutant virus particle will only make up a small portion
of the virus population inside a person's body.
Therefore, it is highly unlikely that this particular particle will be able
to spread to a new person. Whereas, in the vaccinated, their weak immune
response specifically selects for the mutant variants. It is highly likely
that if a vaccinated person passes on the virus to another person, the particles
they pass on will be those that have the ability to escape from the immune
response elicited by the vaccines. An analogy would be if you did an experiment
with 500 room temperature petri dishes filled with bacteria and 500 heated
petri dishes with bacteria, then found a heat resistant variant but didn't
know which dish it came from. It would be absurd to think that the heat
resistant strain of bacteria came from the room temperature petri dishes.
It would possible, sure, but completely improbable that the heat resistant
strain had suddenly appeared in a room temp petri dish. There would be no
reason for it to become a dominant strain in that environment. Logically,
statistically, and evolutionarily, it must have come from the heated petri
dishes. This is a very basic and obvious conclusion, but the media and government
bureaucrats in lab coats are trying to tell you that the absurd thing is
true. They're trying to say that the unvaccinated (the room temperature
petri dishes) are where the vaccine resistant strains are coming from.
3. There is a potential for ADE, antibody dependent enhancement. This is
when the virus mutates so that the antibodies no longer neutralize the virus
but the antibodies still try to attach to it. This can actually help the
virus get into your immune cells because when the virus is covered with
antibodies it will draw macrophages to the virus that will try to eat it.
However, when your macrophages come to eat the virus particle that they
think has been neutralized, the virus gets inside them and starts replicating
because the antibodies actually didn't neutralize the virus. Your own antibodies
act like a kind of Trojan Horse. Another way that ADE can happen is your
own antibodies connect to the receptors of your cells and actually help
the virus get in directly. This was a huge problem with the Dengue vaccine
and we need to do a lot of testing to make sure this isn't a possibility.
Clearly with these rushed vaccines we haven't eliminated this possibility
and with the virus mutating, ADE may pop up with a later variant. We must
stay vigilant and keep an eye out for this signal. It will manifest as people
with high antibody levels being more likely to get sick and die.
4. There is a potential for an autoimmune response from the vaccines. The
vaccines that were developed for Sars-Cov-1 used the spike protein, just
like the vaccines for Sars-Cov-2. Unfortunately, those vaccines caused the
animals to develop serious autoimmune disorders and they ended up causing
severe organ damage. There is a question about whether these new vaccines,
which also focus on the spike protein, will also cause autoimmune disorders.
The problem is that autoimmune disorders take time to develop and to show
up. It may also take a long time before doctors and scientists can link
the sudden rise in autoimmune disorders with these vaccines. Usually, in
a vaccine trial you closely monitor your trial group for years and years.
This allows you to identify the signals. With the current program of injecting
millions of people, there will be no clear way to link causation to the
vaccines and an increase in autoimmune disorders may just fly under the
radar. We may not know for a very long time or never. Another concern is
that because of the way the mRNA vaccines work, they cause your own cells
to present as foreign entities. Your immune system comes over and starts
killing your own cells. This has never been done before in human history.
We have no idea if there will be long term consequences for this and whether
this will lead to autoimmune disorders.
5. The mRNA vaccines are narrowly focused on just the spike protein when
they could have been designed to target more proteins. The Covid19 coronavirus
has 4 main proteins. There are 3 on its outside and 1 on the inside. The
S-protein, the M-protein, and the E-protein, are on the outside, while the
N-protein is on the inside. When you get a natural infection your body will
likely produce antibodies for all or most of these proteins (depending on
the function of your own unique immune system). We knew from studying Sars-Cov-1
that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein are both neutralizing.
In fact, they used exactly that knowledge when they designed the current
vaccines. So, they could have tried to make vaccines that utilize the M-protein
to avoid the potential for autoimmune disorders discussed above. But they
didn't, they instead focused only on the S-protein. They could have designed
the vaccines so that they present both the S-protein and the M-protein.
This would have made the vaccines much more effective and less leaky since
any mutated virus particles would have to have mutated both the S-protein
and the M-protein to avoid the antibodies. Whereas, the current vaccines
are narrowly focused on just the S-protein, meaning that the virus only
has to mutate the one protein. It is exponentially harder for an organism
to mutate two beneficial traits vs just mutating one beneficial trait. So,
these vaccines are worse than they could have been.
Vaccine efficacy:- Article explains how vaccine
manufacturers have used relative risk reduction to determine that vaccine
efficacy is ~90+%, however they should have used absolute risk reduction
which would tell us that the vaccines will only reduce total covid cases
by ~1%: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
Addendum to the above information. This video from 2013 explains the difference
between relative and absolute risk reduction in a very simple way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K30MGvOs5s&ab_channel=TerryShaneyfelt
Article from 2005 explains that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein
are effective in neutralizing the sars-cov1 virus. However, the sars-cov2
vaccines only target the S-protein. This is evidence that the vaccine manufacturers
could have chosen to make a superior mrna vax that produced two types of
antibodies, but chose to focus narrowly on just the S-protein: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16544518/
Antibodies from vaccines start to drop within 6 months, get ready for endless
boosters: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03777-9
6. There are alternative treatments that are effective against Covid19 but
they are being suppressed. Why? Because the vaccines are not approved by
the FDA but instead they are emergency use authorized only. The emergency
use authorization can only be granted if "there are no adequate, approved,
and available alternatives". Well, a growing body of scientific research
is showing that both Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine (among other drugs) are
adequate alternatives for early treatment of Covid19, and both of these
drugs have been FDA approved for years. Unfortunately, that means they are
now off patent and no one can make any money off of them. So, for the vaccines
to continue to receive their EUA, the existence of these treatments must
be suppressed. We have seen a huge amount of censorship of doctors who have
been speaking out about these drugs.
7. We've known for decades that once you are infected with a virus or disease,
your body creates a robust immune response, including memory T cells and
B cells. These cells stick around so that you can quickly respond to a new
infection. However, this fact is being completely ignored by vaccine pushers,
they want a needle in every arm, even in the arms of those who do not need
it, like the covid recovered. We might say, well covid is new and different,
and perhaps immunity wanes after a time. This assumption was prudent in
the beginning of the pandemic but now we have lots of evidence that the
covid recovered have a near zero chance of getting sick again. Your body
takes a few weeks and months to build up its antibodies after an infection.
Most of the time the second infection takes place during this time frame.
There is no reason to force every covid recovered patient to take an experimental
drug, especially after that initial 3 month period after they have build
up a sufficient immune response. If you still think that the miniscule chance
that their immune system has failed makes them a danger, then why are these
people not asked for proof of antibodies. It's because they don't actually
care if you have antibodies. The vaccinated, without knowing whether they
have antibodies or not, can walk around free, but a covid recovered patient,
with proof of antibodies is still considered a danger. It's ass backwards
and it is evidence that vax pushers don't actually care about immunity.
It is just about getting a needle into every arm. The reason why they are
doing this, I do not know I leave it up to you, but it doesn't make sense
and I make a point of not going along with things that don't make sense.
8. There is a growing amount of data that people are having severe reactions
to the vaccines. It gets little to no coverage in the press, in some cases
people who talk about their reactions on social media are being censored
and called anti-vaxxers (I mean, how asinine to call someone who took the
jab an anti-vaxxer) or fakers (I am sure some are faking for money/attention,
but I highly doubt it's many of them given the social consequences for lying).
Some senators have done press conferences with these people so they can
tell their stories. There are publicly accessible government databases which
contain reports of people who have had adverse reactions to the vaccines.
These systems were put in place in the 90's to act as a sort of early warning
system and to give transparency to the public after previous botched vaccine
rollouts like the 1976 swine flu vaccine debacle. You can go and read these
reports for yourself. There are websites that download the reports and present
them to the public in a very readable manner (the government website from
the 90's is not very good). There are concerns that these reports are being
made in error or by bad actors. However, research has been done into these
systems and it was found that more than 80% of the adverse reactions had
seemingly no other cause or explaination aside from the vaccine. In the
past, if a vaccine hit 50 deaths or a few hundred adverse reactions on these
reporting systems, they would shutdown the vaccination program. As of writing
this, for the covid vaccines the deaths are into the thousands and the serious
adverse reactions are into the hundreds of thousands. Yet they just keep
rolling with the shots and now are even forcibly manadating the shot.
9. Criminals are innocent until proven guilty, but medical drugs are not
like criminals, medical drugs are guilty until proven innocent. Pharmaceutical
companies must prove the innocence of their medications through long term
testing. Doctors, bureaucrats, and the public seem to have forgotten this
fact when they mandate a new technology to be injected into us without long
term testing to prove the innocence of the drug. The vaccine may have completely
unknown and serious side effects that manifest in a majority of the people
only in the long term. So, the vax may appear to be safe in the short term,
but in the long run it causes severe harm or even death. It is extremely
risky to innoculate the entire population if we don't know what the long
term effects may be. It is especially risky to vax our critical workers
with an experimental drug about which we know nothing in the long term.
If it turns out that within 2 years of taking it, the vaccine causes the
debilitation of a large portion of the people who took it and we had forced
all our healthcare professionals to take it, then our countries will lose
a large portion of their healthcare professionals. This would devastate
our society's ability to treat the sick and cause massive death and suffering.
Same goes for the military. If we vax all our fighters, and the vax turns
out to greatly physically or mentally weaken most of the people who took
it, there goes our ability to defend ourselves. We won't be able to fight
off any aggressors and will lose years of military experience as we will
have to re-train a whole new set of recruits without the previous military
leaders. If most of the laborers are vaxxed and the vax causes bodily weakness,
then they won't be able to go to work and our production falls to zero.
Without domestic production, we would have to rely on foreign imports but
the economy would also grind to a halt so the nation would have no money
to pay for these imports. This would probably be a death stroke for whatever
nation was victim to it. So, force vaccinating critical workers, or even
a large portion of the menial labor force, is a massive national security
risk. We also have no way of calculating how large the percentage of risk
is since we know nothing at all about the long term effects of innoculation
with this type of technology. This could utterly destroy any highly vaxxed
nations. This outcome would be so bad (total collapse of a society's infrastructure)
that only a massive amount of safety data could justify innoculating the
entire population with any treatment. But we just don't have that safety
data for these experimental drugs right now, and will probably not have
it for decades to come. By then, it will be too late to do anything about
it. You can fry an egg, but you can't unfry it. Just the same, you won't
be able to unvax the population, there's no way to get the vax out of the
body once it's in. The solution is to only vax the old and vulnerable at
risk populations and not vax everyone. This issue worries me deeply since
there must be risk responsive people at high levels of government who must
understand and be sensitive to this type of national security risk. Yet,
these people are either being completely ignored or they are allowing the
government to proceed with the risky mass vaccination programs anyway.
Separately, these 9 issues would be a concern. But put together, they are
incredibly alarming. To me, something feels very wrong here. You too may
have already felt it in your gut or in the back of your mind or when reading
this. That feeling that something is wrong is instinct, it is the product
of millions of years of evolution. A gift from our ancestors who also saw
something that was wrong in their environment and had this weird bad feeling.
They acted on it and it saved them. So they were able to pass on that instinct
to their off-spring from generation to generation. Now, after millions of
years, it finds its way to you. If you feel what I feel, that something
is very wrong here, I implore you:
Do
not ignore it.
Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine
Nabin K. Shrestha,1 Patrick C. Burke,2 Amy S. Nowacki,3
James F. Simon,4 Amanda Hagen,5 Steven M. Gordon1 1 Departments of Infectious
Diseases, 2 Infection Prevention, 3 Quantitative Health Sciences, 4 Enterprise
Business Intelligence, and 5 Occupational Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio, USA. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; effectiveness; vaccines; bivalent
vaccine; Running Title: COVID-19 bivalent vaccine effectiveness
RESULTS:
Among 51011 employees, 20689 (41%) had had a previous documented episode of
COVID-19, and 42064 (83%) had received at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine.
COVID-19 occurred in 2452 (5%) during the study. Risk of COVID-19 increased
with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of
vaccine doses previously received. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated
state was independently associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, .70; 95%
C.I., .61-.80), leading to an estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 30% (95%
CI, 20-39%). Compared to last exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 90 days, last exposure
6-9 months previously was associated with twice the risk of COVID-19, and last
exposure 9-12 months previously with 3.5 times the risk. IN
THEIR QUEST TO PREVENT another SARS-like outbreak, Chinese and Western scientists
pursued new viruses from bat caves in Southern China. Their efforts would lead
them to a mine in Mojiang, China, where six miners had fallen ill with COVID-like
symptoms.
It was here that Shi Zheng-li of the Wuhan Institute of Virology found the closest
known relative to COVID-19. This virus, along with thousands of other virus
samples, would be brought back to several labs in Wuhan. The Chinese labs were
partially funded by Western organizations including Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance.
When the COVID-19 pandemic erupted in Wuhan,efforts to promote a natural origins
theory while dispelling any discussion of a potential lab leak were spearheaded
by Fauci and involved a number of leading Western scientists. Infographic:
COVID-19 Outbreak & Cover-up | Download
The Infographic 8 MB JPG
Antibiotic-Resistant
Pathogens and Mask Exhaustion Syndrome
The featured study looked only at the raw numbers from Kansas and did not delve
into what may have been behind the increasing severity of disease and death
in the people who wore masks. For example, when researchers from the University
of Antwerp, Belgium, analyzed the microbial community on surgical and cotton
face masks from 13 healthy volunteers after being worn for four hours, bacteria
including Bacillus, Staphylococcus and Acinetobacter were found — 43% of which
were antibiotic-resistant. Researchers from Germany similarly questioned whether
a mask that covers your nose and mouth is “free from undesirable side effects”
and potential hazards in everyday use. It turned out they were not and instead
posed significant adverse effects and pathophysiological changes, including
the following, which often occur in combination.
References" The Daily
Skeptic, May 2, 2022 Cureus, 2022;14(4) PLOS|One, 2021, doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252315
medRxiv, August 7, 2021, doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385 Abstract medRxiv,
May 25, 2021; doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385 Yahoo News, January 1, 2021
Hull York Medical School, April 6, 2022 Western Standard, April 17, 2022 Journal
of Hazardous Material, 2021;411 BitChute January 1, 2021 1:58 City Journal August
11, 2021 MMWR July 17, 2020 / 69(28);930-932 Frontiers in Medicine, 2021; doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.732047
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021 Apr;
18(8): 4344 ABC News10, November 8, 2021 New York Post, November 3, 2021 Flgov.com,
Ron Desantis July 30, 2021 The Daily Wire, November 14, 2021 The Daily Wire,
November 14, 2021, para 6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, June 2,
2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, June 6, 2022, Table 1 Total
tab Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, January 25, 2022 medRxiv,
August 7, 2021, doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385 Medicine, 2022;101(7) 42
43 References"
DISPELLING
THE MYTH of “A PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED”
If ICU capacity were really a concern … • Why hasn't the government been able
to increase ICU capacity during this time? • Why did they not re-direct the
millions received for vaccine passports toward increasing capacity and relief
for weary health care workers? • Why did they lay off 10,000 unvaccinated workers
who had served faithfully over the course of the pandemic?
Uncoupling of deaths from hospitalizations occurred prior to the achievement
of therapeutic vaccination rates meaning it is unlikely that it is due to mass
vaccination
MORE HOSPITALIZATIONS IN VACCINATED Dispelling the myth of the pandemic of the
unvaccinated 27 Ontario COVID-19 Hospital and ICU Admissions by Vaccination
Status from August 8, 2021 to January 20, 202
INVESTIGATIVE
REPORTS
Schwab Family Values Is the real Klaus Schwab a kindly old uncle figure wishing
to do good for humanity, or is he really the son of a Nazi collaborator who
used slave labour and aided Nazi efforts to obtain the first atomic bomb? Johnny
Vedmore investigates. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/02/investigative-reports/schwab-family-values/
AmericanMind.Org:https://americanmind.org/salvo/thats-not-happening-and-its-good-that-it-is/
A quick and dirty guide to regime propaganda Gaslighting getting you down? Feel
like the regime has dialed the Megaphone
up to, and past, eleven? You’re not crazy. It’s definitely happening and likely
to get worse as our masters’ ability to cope with reality further worsens—or worse,
they gain the complete and absolute control they seek. They’re both scornful and
terrified of dissent, which explains why they incessantly shriek at us and lie
to our faces. Continue
reading...
"We have compelling evidence (Download
PDF document - 85 pages with links - 16 MB) that no one has been able to refute
that clearly shows that treating the virus with repurposed drugs is far safer
and far more effective against all variants than using the current unsafe and
relatively ineffective vaccines. Physicians with thousands of real life cases
are reporting very few COVID hospitalizations and a near 100% record in preventing
death from COVID and zero deaths or disabilities from the treatment itself."
Twitter: @VaccineTruth2 Gab: @VaccineTruth2 Email: vaccinetruth2@protonmail.com
Download PDF document - 85 pages
with links - 16 MB
The
domain Scream.org is for sale by owner
$7,000 USD or 4 ETH - contact info@scream.org
